Ordinance of Covenanting
James Dodson
HOMEPAGE FOR THE ORDINANCE OF COVENANTING
“I pray you peruse the particulars to be opposed by vertue of your Covenant, Popery, Prelacy, Profanenesse, Schisme, Heresie; and do not dare to indulge any abomination, which you have vowed to oppose: Take heed that no sinfull biasse of near relations, or any self-advantages, take you off from your faithfullnesse in this kinde. The Holy Ghost makes this a character of an heir of Heaven, Psal. 15:4. He sweares and keeps it, though to his own hinderance: Therefore let not fear of losing a customer, a friend, an office, a good bargain, or any other outward advantage, hinder you in keeping your Covenant.”—Simeon Ashe, Religious Covenanting Directed, and Covenant-keeping perswaded (1646).
Works on the Ordinance of Covenanting:
The Solemn League And Covenant.-1643-The Three Kingdoms of England, Scotland and Ireland.-This is both a political league and a religious covenant between the three nations for establishing a covenanted uniformity of religion together with providing a mutual defense.
An Ordinance of the Lords and Commons, enjoining the taking of the late Solemn League and Covenant, throughout the Kingdom of England and Dominion of Wales.-1643-The Parliament.-An Act designed to see that the Solemn League and Covenant was subscribed throughout England and Wales including instructions for how to subscribe.
England’s Covenant Proved Lawful and necessary Also at this Time, both by Scripture and Reason. Together With sundry Answers to the usual Objections made against it.-1643-Samuel Clarke (1599-1682).-In this short piece, Clarke sets forth the difference between lawful and unlawful covenants and explains why the Solemn League was lawful as well as a blessing to the English people. He touches on some other issues, such as resisting the King versus resisting his tyrannical counsellors. This contains important insight into the view of the English Puritans regarding the doctrine and practice of covenanting.
The Great Danger of Covenant-refusing, and Covenant-breaking.-1645-Edmund Calamy (1600-1666).-Westminster divine Edmund Calamy’s sermon on the ordinance of covenanting wherein he describes the use of covenanting together with warnings against refusing to covenant or, what it worse, to break covenant.
A Declaration Of The Commissioners Of The General Assembly, Concerning Present Dangers, And Duties Relating To The Covenant And Religion.-1648-The National Church of Scotland.-The assembly issues a warning to a careful keeping of the Solemn League and explains why it is dangerous to recede from this.
Whether it be Lawful, Just, & Expedient, that there be an Ordinance of Parliament for the Taking of the Solemn League & Covenant, By All Persons in the Kingdom, Under a Considerable Penalty.-1649-George Gillespie.-An essay designed to explain both the necessity of enforcing the Solemn League and the duty of requiring all persons who are capable in the kingdom to take this as their own vow under threat of civil penalties.
ΑΝΑΛΗΨΙΣ ΑΝΕΛΗΦΘΗ, The Fastening of St. PETERS FETTERS. By SEVEN Links, or Propositions. OR, The Efficacy and Extent of the Solemn League and Covenant asserted and vindicated, against The Doubts and Scruples of Dr. John Gauden’s Anonymous Questionist. St. Peters Bonds not only loosed, but annihilated by Mr. John Russel, Attested by John Gauden, D.D. The League Illegal, falsely fathered on Dr. Daniel Featley: AND THE Reasons of the University of Oxford for not taking (now pleaded to discharge the obligation of) the Solemn League and Covenant.-1660-Zachary Crofton (1626-1672).-This text is a robust theological and legal defense of the Solemn League and Covenant, written during the Restoration era to argue for its continuing and permanent obligation upon the British kingdoms. Addressing critics such as the “Oxford Reasons,” Dr. Featley, Dr. John Gauden, and Mr. Russel, the author systematically vindicates the Covenant’s manner, authority, and form—countering charges of solecism, ambiguity, and illegality by asserting Parliament’s authority to act in national emergencies and Charles II’s subsequent oath as retroactive validation. Central to the work is the argument that the Covenant is a public, national bond rather than a mere private promise, and because it invokes God as witness and avenger, no human power can absolve its obligation; to break it is perjury against God, binding both the present generation and posterity to its duties so long as the nation endures.
A Sermon Preach’d Upon Breach of Covenant.-1663-John Guthrie (ca. 1632-1669).-A sermon on the binding nature of covenants and the consequences that fall to those who break them.
HEAD III.-The Refusing to Swear & Subscribe the many unlawful imposed Oaths, for which many have suffered great Cruelties; Chiefly that of Abjuration which was the Cause of Several their Suffering to Death, Vindicated.-1687-Alexander Shields.-In this chapter, Mr. Shields explains the doctrine of oaths and vows and discusses why Covenanters cannot take certain kinds of oaths. Much of this discussion is necessary to gain an understanding about the doctrine of covenanting itself.
A Modest Reply to a Pamphlet, Entitled; A LETTER from a Friend to Mr. John M‘millan; Showing that his Principles and Practice, are consonant to the Word of GOD, our Confession of Faith and Covenants, and to the Practice of CHRIST, his Apostles, and the Primitive Christians; and that the Anti-scriptural Principles Objected to him by the Author, of casting off all Ecclesiastical and Civil Authority, are False and Injurious Imputations. With a Vindication of the Contending and Suffering, Remnant of the true Covenanted Presbyterians of the Church of Scotland, their present Practice in refusing to concur with the present Church and State in their Backsliding Courses.-1710-Hugh Clark.-This is a polemical defense of the Rev. John Macmillan, written in response to a series of queries and remarks by ministers of the established Church of Scotland. The author systematically answers fifteen queries, arguing that the established Church has defected from the covenanted principles of the Church of Scotland’s purest era. He contends that the Church has abandoned the National Covenant and Solemn League and Covenant, submitted to Erastian state control, failed to censure perjury and compliance with past tyrannical oaths, and embraced an unlawful union with England and an Oath of Abjuration contrary to the Covenants. Against these charges, the author defends Macmillan’s continued preaching after deposition as both lawful and necessary, arguing that an unjust sentence from a backsliding judicatory cannot invalidate a minister’s divine commission. He further justifies separation from the established Church by appeal to Scripture (e.g., 2 Cor. 6:17, 2 Thess. 3:6) and Reformed divines like Rutherford and Durham, and defends the Dissenters’ refusal to own the present civil magistrate (Queen Anne) on the grounds that she is oath-bound to uphold Prelacy, which violates the nation’s covenanted obligations.
A Converse Betwixt Two Presbyterians of the Established Church, An Elder and a Preacher. Wherein, The Presbyterian Dissenters from the Establish’d Church, are vindicate from the Charge of Jacobitism; their Principles anent Civil Government, are fairly stated, and succinctly proven consonant to Scripture Light, and the Confession of Faith; and several Important Objections thereanent, answered. For Confirmation of the Weak, and Information of the Misinformed in that Matter.-1714-United Societies?-This 1714 dialogue features an Elder and a Preacher of the established Church of Scotland discussing the Presbyterian Dissenters (Cameronians/United Societies) who refused to acknowledge Queen Anne’s authority. The Preacher voices the common accusation that such disaffection proves Jacobite sympathies, while the Elder systematically vindicates the Dissenters by demonstrating that their covenanting principles—particularly their commitment to the National Covenant and Solemn League, which made Presbyterian religion a fundamental constitutional requirement for Scottish rulers—actually make them the staunchest opponents of the Popish Pretender. The dialogue then explores the Dissenters’ political theology in depth: their distinction between just and legal authority (which requires constitutional qualifications) versus mere power, their argument that Scotland’s covenants cannot be rescinded by Parliament, and the practical consequences of these convictions including refusal to pay cess or appear before civil courts. The work serves both as an apologetic clearing the Dissenters of Jacobitism and as a substantive exposition of covenanting resistance theory.
A Short Exposition of the Popish Tenets Abjured in our National Covenant, or Confession of Faith, With a plain Refutation of these Errors.-1745-Anonymous.-This exposition argues that Roman Catholicism is a false, antichristian religion because it fails the four tests of true religion: its efficient cause is human invention rather than God; its material cause is human tradition rather than divine truth; its formal cause contradicts Scripture; and its final cause robs God of glory by attributing salvation to human merit. The author systematically refutes twenty specific “Popish tenets,” focusing on the Pope’s usurped authority over Scripture, conscience, and the state; the corruption of the sacraments, particularly the Mass and Transubstantiation; and the denial of justification by faith alone, replacing it with works, merits, purgatory, and indulgences. Additionally, it condemns unscriptural practices such as praying to saints and angels, auricular confession, monastic vows of celibacy and poverty, and the Church’s worldly hierarchy. The treatise concludes by asserting the regulative principle of worship: that not only what is contrary to Scripture must be rejected, but also anything introduced without explicit scriptural warrant, branding such innovations as will-worship and superstition.
The Distinguishing Practice of our Reforming Ancestors.-1771-John Brown of Haddington.-Excerpted from a larger work on the history of the church, this contains his observations and comments on the covenanting practiced by older Presbyterians.
Letters of Importance: Wherein are contained some serious QUERIES Upon several very interesting POINTS; MOST HUMBLY AND RESPECTFULLY DIRECTED To the ensuing VENERABLE SYNOD of ULSTER. Craving that they may be read, and seriously considered at their next MEETING, 1775. WITH AN APPENDIX CONTAINING A Short and serious ADDRESS to the PROTESTANT DISSENTERS IN THE NORTH of IRELAND, Under the pastoral INSPECTION of the foresaid respectable SYNOD.-1775-“Pistophilos Philecclesia”.-This treatise is a fervent appeal to the Synod of Ulster to address its internal divisions regarding the Westminster Confession of Faith. The author laments the growing indifference and contempt toward the Confession and the Solemn League and Covenant, attributing this decline to the rise of Arianism and anti-subscriptionism since 1718. Arguing that the Confession is founded on Scripture and that the Covenants are therefore morally binding on posterity, the author challenges the Synod to either publicly vindicate and enforce these standards or formally reject them. If the majority continues to tolerate heresy and neglect orthodoxy, the author contends that the faithful minority is duty-bound to remonstrate and, if necessary, separate to preserve the truth. The accompanying appendix urges the laity to diligently search the Scriptures, guard against false teachers, and steadfastly defend the faith.
A Review of a Paper Lately Written Against the Being and Binding Obligation of our Sacred NATIONAL COVENANTS; Especially, the SOLEMN LEAGUE and COVENANT of the Three Kingdoms. Whereunto An Analysis of the SOLEMN LEAGUE and COVENANT of Scotland, England, and Ireland, is prefixed and some TESTIMONIES of learned and orthodox Divines for these COVENANTS are subjoined.-1779-Anonymous.-This Covenanter text is a defense of the Scottish National Covenant and Solemn League and Covenant against their critics. The author argues against the Independent requirement of demonstrating saving grace for church admission, contending that Scripture shows the visible church has always included unregenerate members who were not expelled unless they totally apostatized. He presents multiple arguments for the lawfulness of national covenanting—that oaths and vows are morally binding, that the covenants contain nothing beyond what God’s word already requires, and that such engagements are warranted by Scripture and approved by God. The author insists these covenants bind posterity, citing scriptural precedents like the Gibeonite covenant and Joseph’s bones, as well as the natural authority of parents and the public faith of nations. The work concludes with collected testimonies from covenanting ministers and assemblies attesting to the covenants’ lawfulness, necessity, and continuing obligation, while lamenting their widespread violation and neglect.
Thoughts on Covenant Obligation.-1798-Anonymous.-This short article examines the issue of covenant obligation particularly with respect to religious covenants but with the understanding that many of the comments pertain to social and national covenants.
Observations on the Public Covenants, Betwixt God and the Church.-1799-Archibald Mason.-A thorough survey of Biblical data and theological reasoning on the subject of covenanting. Mason discusses the duty, obligations and blessings which accrue to churches and nations that enter into this ordinance.
An Inquiry into the Obligation of Religious Covenants Upon Posterity.-1801-George Paxton.-This theological treatise vigorously defends the binding obligation of Scotland’s National Covenant (1638) and Solemn League and Covenant (1643) against various objections. Systematically addressing charges of political motivation, intolerance, enthusiasm, illegality, and improper civil enforcement, the author argues from Scripture and history that these covenants—despite imperfections in their form and administration—impose enduring moral and religious obligations upon posterity. The work concludes with urgent addresses to the British Churches, warning of divine judgment for their apostasy from these sacred engagements, and to the Secession Church, cautioning against spiritual decline and urging a return to the covenant-renovating zeal of their fathers.
A Sermon on Covenanting.-1803-Samuel Brown Wylie.-An excellent sermon on the duty of covenanting originally published with “Two Sons of Oil.” This is a reasoned defense which includes discussions of federal headship and descending obligations of social and religious covenants.
The Obligation of Covenants.-1803-Samuel Brown Wylie.-A sermon that demonstrates the Scriptural basis for the doctrine of covenanting which also explains how and why social covenanting can bind descending generations.
The Duty of Nations.-1810-Gilbert McMaster.-A sermon on national covenanting together with the duty of nations that are favored with the light of the Gospel to engage in this ordinance.
A Discourse on the Sin and Danger of Opposition to Public Religious Covenanting, From Acts V. 38, 39.-1812-William C. Brownlee (1784-1860).-Brownlee preached this discourse in June 1811 to urge covenant renewal upon congregations that had long neglected the duty. His argument from Gamaliel’s counsel—that opposing a divine institution is fighting against God—is ably constructed, and his historical survey of covenanting's efficacy in the church, particularly the Scottish revivals, provides valuable testimony. Less commendable is the Seceder framework from which he writes: having rejected the civil component of the covenants, and having insisted on rewriting the bonds rather than renewing them in their original language accommodated to a remnant's peculiar status, the Seceders effectively preserved the form while hollowing the substance. For Covenanters, the civil terms still bound them to a distinct dissent from a constitutionally rebellious government, and no rewriting could remove that obligation without unfaithfulness. Brownlee’s criticism of the Reformed Presbytery’s infrequent covenanting thus misses the mark—he mistakes their careful providentialism for neglect, while his own tradition had already surrendered the covenant's most demanding features.
A Plea for the Covenanted Reformation in Britain and Ireland.-1822-George Stevenson.-In this treatise, Stevenson defends the doctrine of religious social covenants. The discussion has interesting and useful comments on the use of creeds and the need for testimony bearing. However, its most important component is its explanation and defense of the descending obligations of covenants. Originally written in 1822, this is the third edition expanded by some twenty pages of material.
The Vow:-1831-James Renwick Willson.-This sacramental sermon focuses on the doctrine of oaths and vows. It discusses the implications of vows for people in various connections, from members of the church to nations. In this, Mr. Willson has much to say about public social covenanting in church and state.
Letter on the Relations of Covenanters to the Civil Government of America.-1833-Robert Gibson.-In this letter to the Albany Quarterly, a magazine produced by the “Old Lights,” Gibson corrects many errors espoused by Gilbert McMaster who had gone off with the “New Lights” and abandoned the testimony of the Reformed Presbyterian Church. It is notable because it spends time explaining how Covenanters viewed their relation to the civil government of the United States and has interesting remarks on the subject of slavery.
An Overture entitled “Testimony for Public Covenanting.”-1839-Synod of the Reformed Presbyterian Church.-The American Synod presents the doctrine of covenanting together with its history with an eye to renovation of covenants. This document is filled with many helpful and interesting information not easily available elsewhere.
The Duty of Social Covenanting illustrated and enforced.-1841-Thomas Sproull.-A sermon on the doctrine of social covenanting together with how covenant keeping holds the key for Presbyterian reunion.
Lecture VII.-1841-William Symington.-An essay exploring the doctrine of social covenanting with an excellent discussion of the descending obligations of lawful covenants upon the societies which entered into them. In addition, Symington undertakes a defence of the National Covenant and Solemn League and Covenant.
Overture on Renewing the National Covenant and Solemn League.-1843-James Chrystie.-Writing on behalf of the Synod, Chrystie sets forth a proposed form and preamble for the renewing of the covenants, National and Solemn League, by the Synod of the Reformed Presbyterian Church in North America.
The Descending Obligation, and Renovation of Covenants.-1844-Robert Hutcheson.-This sermon, preached before the Lakes Presbytery, gives a very good overview of the doctrine and practice of covenanting. It is a very helpful survey of many topics necessary for having a robust understanding of the ordinance of social covenanting.
Covenant Renovation.-1849-James Renwick Willson.-A short article calling for covenant renovation with special reference to the relation of the Solemn League and Covenant to the United States.
Public Covenanting.-1849-James Renwick Willson.-A terse defense of the binding obligation of the Solemn League and Covenant upon the United States.
Seasons of Covenanting.-1850-James Renwick Willson.-A short article pressing for covenant renewal, including the Solemn League and Covenant, because the signs of the times warrant such practice.
The Reformed Presbyterian Catechism.-1853-William L. Roberts.-An excellent overview of Reformed Presbyterian principles set in a catechetical form. Roberts covers many forgotten and neglected topics which are of important to the life and identity of the Covenanter church.
A Pastoral Letter.-1854-James Smyth.-This sermon, given with reference to the recent act of covenant renovation amongst the Irish Reformed Presbyterian Church, is an interesting production for several reasons. First, it gives a short history which helps us to understand the relation of the Irish Covenanters to the Reformed Presbyterian movement at large. Second, it contains a very good and concise outline of the doctrine of public social covenanting. Third, it shows an awareness of the moral obligation of covenants upon posterity. This is a good place to begin reading to gain insight into the distinctive principles of the Reformed Presbyterian Church.
“Form of Covenant Renovation.”-1856-Reformed Presbytery.-This report of the Reformed Presbytery is an examination of the “form” drawn up by the Old Light Synod for covenant renewal. This critique explains some of the defects in the views of the majority in the Old Light Synod. As for the “draught” of the New Light Synod, the committee of the Reformed Presbytery dismisses it as wholly insufficient.
Social Religious Covenanting.-1856-James M. Willson.-A survey of the doctrine of social covenanting with both an exposition and application designed as an apologetic for the Reformed Presbyterian position.
A Memorial of Covenanting.-1857-Thomas Houston.-A volume written to instruct the Irish Reformed Presbyterians in the duty and obligation of covenanting in consequence of their covenant “renewal” in Dervock, 1853. This volume contains much of historical value and concerning the doctrine of covenanting generally. However, it is defective in its views of the manner of covenant renovation.
Principles and Position of the Reformed Presbyterian Church.-1858-John Graham.-This work outlines the foundational testimony of the Reformed Presbyterian Church, emphasizing its commitment to Scripture, evangelical doctrine, and Presbyterian polity as divinely instituted. It strongly protests against Popery and Prelacy while asserting that civil magistrates and nations are morally obligated to submit to Christ and the Word of God. A primary focus is the enduring, binding authority of the National Covenant of Scotland and the Solemn League and Covenant, which the authors argue were sinfully abandoned. Graham justifies the Covenanter’s position of dissent from the established church, arguing that the 1688 Revolution compromised the Reformation by re-establishing Episcopacy, allowing state supremacy over the church, and neglecting the covenant obligations sealed by the blood of martyrs. Ultimately, it presents these distinct principles not as narrow or unpatriotic, but as the essential groundwork for a future, comprehensive reformation of both church and society under the headship of Christ.
Hephzibah Beulah. Our Covenants the National and Solemn League; and Covenanting by the Reformed Presbyterian Synod in America: Considered.-1872-James W. Shaw.-An engaging and often trenchant critique of the 1871 Covenant sworn at Pittsburgh by a minister who remained in the communion of the RPCNA after they had abandoned their covenant bonds.
The Reformed Presbyterian Church and Covenanting.-1872-Anonymous.-An interesting article written by a Seceder which reviews the “Covenant of 1871” and shows that the Pittsburgh “Covenanters” are of a very different character than those who emitted the “Act, Declaration and Testimony,” of 1761. In 1871, the “American” covenant demonstrated that those claiming to be the Reformed Presbyterians [i.e., the RPCNA] had become de facto and practically Seceders.
National Covenanting A National Privilege.-1873-Thomas Hobart (1829-1898).-The subject of this sermon, which it so succinctly and ably treats, is one of vast importance, though in these days little thought of or understood. Secession minister Thomas Hobart discusses the parties who engage in covenant, the warrant for covenanting, the nature of covenanting, and then makes some very helpful remarks on covenanting. The defects in his discussion are only with respect to those matters respecting the civil portion of the covenants as is to be expected from a Seceder. These points can be supplied by reading the works of Reformed Presbyterians, or Covenanters.
Protest and Declinature of John McAuley.-1873-John McAuley.-In this Protest and Declinature, John McAuley explains how the RPCNA ceased to be the Reformed Presbyterian and became something radically different. This suicide of the Covenanter identity within the RP Synod necessitates separation and demands honesty on the part of those who continue to claim to be Covenanters under the umbrella of the “Covenant of 1871.”
Review of the New Covenant. Adopted at Pittsburg, PA. May, A.D. 1871.-1874-Anonymous.-This first article examines the claims of those who entered into the “Covenant of 1871” and shows that it was not a renewal of the National Covenant or Solemn League and Covenant but a replacement covenant which confirms the departure of the RPCNA from the ranks of genuine Covenanters.
The New Covenant. General, Evasive, and Equivocal.-1874-Anonymous.-In this second article, the author of a previous in the Reformation Advocate, continues his critique of the “Covenant of 1871” and describes how the RPCNA had fairly entered into the theological position of the Seceders in this transaction. On this ground alone, it must be repudiated by all genuine Covenanters.
Defects of the New Covenant.-1874-Anonymous.-This third article, published in the Reformation Advocate, continues the line of attack on the “Covenant of 1871” and raises the question of national religion and its absence by the new “Covenanters.” This, too, indicates that the RPCNA no longer can claim with honesty that they are descendants of the Scottish Covenanters.
Review of A.M. Milligan’s Politics.-1877-Robert Clyde, Sr.-A scathing review of an article on politics by Rev. A.M. Milligan which appeared in Our Banner. Mr. Clyde addresses the complete failure of the RPCNA to exercise political dissent and points to their civil incorporation, or charter, together with the “Covenant of 1871” as examples of their treachery in covenant.
The New Covenant Destroys Christian Liberty and Liberty of Conscience.-1879-John McAuley.-In this article, Mr. McAuley describes and defends the doctrine of Christian liberty set forth in the Westminster Confession and shows that this doctrine is destroyed by the “Covenant of 1871” sworn by the Synod of the RPCNA.
A Short Vindication of our Covenanted Reformation.-1879-David Steele.-A second edition of the principles of the Scottish Second Reformation against the “American” RP “Covenant of 1871.”
Where Hast Thou Gleaned To-Day?-1880-John Clyde.-In this article, Mr. Clyde explains the beliefs of faithful Covenanters versus those espoused by the RPCNA. He also asserts and defends the proposition that the RPCNA is an alien organization springing, not from the Reformed Church of Scotland, but from its civil incorporation and the treacherous “Covenant of 1871.”
A Third Reformation Necessary:-1880-James Kerr.-A sermon calling for Christians to follow in the footsteps of the flock by adopting the piety, enlightened views and Christian patriotism of the Scottish martyrs.
The Attainments of the Church of the Second Reformation.-1896-James Kerr.-An address before the First International Reformed Presbyterian Convention, in which the Reformed Church of Scotland, at the time of the Second Reformation, is presented as Biblical, Calvinistic, covenanting and established.