Contact Us

Use the form on the right to contact us.

You can edit the text in this area, and change where the contact form on the right submits to, by entering edit mode using the modes on the bottom right. 

Form Block
This form needs a storage option. Double-click here to edit this form, and tell us where to save form submissions in the Storage tab. Learn more
         

123 Street Avenue, City Town, 99999

(123) 555-6789

email@address.com

 

You can set your address, phone number, email and site description in the settings tab.
Link to read me page with more information.

Purity of Worship in the Presbyterian Church,

Database

Purity of Worship in the Presbyterian Church,

James Dodson

AS SET FORTH IN

The Westminster Standards,

AND ILLUSTRATED BY OUR HISTORY SINCE THE REFORMATION.

BY JAMES BEGG, D.D.

“In Popery . . . they employed organs and many other such ludicrous things, by which the Word and worship of God are exceedingly profaned.”

Calvin.

“For my part, I am persuaded that, if the organ be admitted, there is no barrier in principle against the sacerdotal system in all its fulness.”

Dr Candlish.

EDINBURGH:

LYON & GEMMELL, GEORGE IV. BRIDGE.

1876.


Printer’s Page

PRINTED BY BALLANTYNE, HANSON AND CO.

EDINBURGH AND LONDON


Page iii

PREFACE.


The object of the following treatise is to give a clear and consecutive view of the worship of the Scottish Church, both as a matter of doctrine and of history. It is many years since any controversy existed amongst Presbyterians on the subject of worship, and therefore much ignorance prevails in regard to it. Errors on this subject, however, must be fatal, not only because of the sacredness of the principles involved, but because the same principles affect the entire round of doctrine, discipline, and government in the Christian Church. In carrying forward the recent innovations in worship, there are very different classes engaged. There are the ignorant and thoughtless. But the most dangerous class are those who know perfectly well what they are doing and aiming at. They are seeking, for political reasons, and contrary to their solemn ordination engagements, virtually to upset the Revolution Settlement by bringing the Scottish Church into as near a resemblance as possible to the Church of England, and this

Page iv

through the agency of an equally unconstitutional congregationalism. In this aim we may venture to predict that, as on former occasions, they will be defeated. But it is sad to be plunged again into the old contest, from which great evils may result; while it is well to keep in view that in such a struggle there can be no middle course. Either the principles of the First and Second Reformation and of the Revolution Settlement in regard to worship, for which our fathers contended, are true and defensible, or Presbyterianism must be abandoned. So far from this, however, we believe that at the present moment Scotland is as earnestly Presbyterian as ever, although she requires enlightenment in regard to this new debate. She only requires to be thoroughly informed in regard to the true bearing of the questions at issue, and the real danger of the schemes pursued, to act with energy as she did of old.

An eminent minister of the Established Church, after condemning the false doctrine, instrumental music in worship, and decided antipathy in certain quarters to the Confession of Faith, adds:—

“With respect to worship, it is now notorious that a whole regiment of innovations has come upon us. There is—1. Liturgies or liturgical prayers, called ‘services;’ 2. Standing at psalmody; 3. Sitting at prayer; 4. Opening the act of public worship by reciting some verses of Scripture, which they call ‘sentences;’ 5. Arranging the Scripture readings,

Page v

psalms, and prayers, so as to have as close an approach as possible to Episcopal forms; 6. The use of uninspired hymns; 7. A constant depreciation of our Sacramental Fast and other days, and an eager recommendation of Christmas and Easter; and, 8. What is called ‘simultaneous communion.’ All these things are now being practised, and I daresay many other things of minor importance, so that it is ridiculous to say that ‘uniformity’ of worship prevails in any of our Presbyterian denominations.”

It is a very serious thing that, in the midst of all this, solemn vows are accepted by all office-bearers, to the effect that they will maintain “uniformity” of worship, and “follow no divisive courses,” whilst apparently by some these vows are taken only to be disregarded. It is high time that our state and prospects in regard to such matters were fully considered.

It may be right to say that the following pages have been the fruit of very considerable labour, including aid from various quarters, for which thanks are cordially returned; and as truth only is sought, suggestions from whatsoever quarter will yet be cordially welcomed. Since this treatise was written, although we rejoice in the emphasis with which the Dunse peculiarities have been rejected by the General Assembly of the Established Church, and in the frustration of the efforts of those who sought to relax the formula for elders, we regret that the Elgin case has been decided in entire opposition, as we think, to the Constitution

Page vi

of the Church and kingdom; but the end of the controversy is not yet.

This treatise has received the cordial approbation of a number of eminent Ministers and Elders; and the following important statement by the able and learned Editor of the works of John Knox will carry great weight, since there is no higher authority on such a question:—

May 9, 1876.

After carefully examining the various authorities (in manuscript as well as printed) that bear on the subject, I can have no hesitation in stating that the conclusions deduced in the following pages seem to me to be fully and satisfactorily established. In particular, I maintain—

1st. That no forms approaching a Liturgical Service were ever adopted or practised by the Church of Scotland, not even during the reign of Charles the Second, when Episcopacy, for nearly thirty years, was in the ascendant; and

2d. That anything resembling Instrumental Music used in Public Worship, until a very recent period, was altogether unknown.

DAVID LAING.


It is to be hoped that this treatise will receive a wide circulation, and be duly considered by all who really value the purity of our Presbyterian worship. It is worse than absurd to profess adherence to the Westminster Standards whilst men trample upon their distinctive principles in regard to the worship of God.

JAMES BEGG.

EDINBURGH, 50 GEORGE SQUARE,

July 1876.


Page vii

CONTENTS.