Expositors commonly frame and lay down some rules by which they suppose symbolic language in general, and the symbols of this book in particular, may be interpreted. On examination, however, it will be discovered that the learned are not agreed either in the nature or number of such rules, and sometimes an expositor who has exerted his ingenuity most in devising canons of interpretation, forgets to apply them.
All languages, whether spoken or written, are more or less metaphorical, interspersed with what are called figures of speech. It is customary to represent nations and tribes, whose language abounds in symbols, as but little advanced in civilization, and to view oriental nations as more disposed to indulge in tropes and figures than those of the west, but perhaps this relative estimate of the modes of speech in the eastern and western hemispheres will admit of some modification, when we consider the gesticulations and similes by which the aborigines of America attempt to give expression to their ideas. The word hieroglyphics, signifying sacred sculpture, derived from the ancient mode of writing by the priests of Egypt, has received conventional currency among the learned, as descriptive of any writing which is obscure, "hard to be understood." And all who read this book will find some of it "dark" indeed. The divine Author intended that it should be so, (ch 13:18,) yet he calls it emphatically, a "Revelation."
We have already noticed, that the symbols in this book are taken from the ceremonial law in part, and part are taken from the works of creation. The heavens and the earth present to our senses a variety of material objects, some more, some less calculated to arrest our attention. Among these, the sun, moon and stars,—earth and sea, mountains and rivers, occupy prominent places. To facilitate our knowledge of these, and prompt reference to any part of them, we generalize or throw them into groups. Thus we speak familiarly of the "solar system," the "animal, vegetable or mineral kingdom." Now, just transfer these systematized objects from the material and physical, to the moral and spiritual world. Then consider what relation any one object bears to the system, and what influence it has upon the other objects of which it is a part, and its import may be generally, satisfactorily and certainly ascertained. Thus the same canons or rules which we apply in the interpretation of other writings, will be equally available in "searching the Scriptures,"—never, never forgetting that it is the Spirit of Christ that "guides into all truth," or his own all-comprehensive rule of interpretation, "comparing spiritual things with spiritual." (1 Cor 2:13.)
In order to the right observance of the divinely prescribed
rule, "comparing spiritual things with spiritual," we must often refer
to the prophecies of the Old Testament,—to the second and seventh chapters
of Daniel in particular, because that prophet, while the church was captive
under the power of literal Babylon, was favoured with a discovery of the
purpose of God, that a succession of imperial powers should afterwards
arise to "try the patience and the faith of the saints." As in the case
of Pharaoh, so in the whole history of the rise, reign and overthrow of
succeeding persecuting powers, Jehovah’s design was precisely the same,—"to
make his power known, and that his name might be declared throughout all
the earth." (Ex 9:16, Rom 9:17.) In connexion with this, he would "glorify
the riches of his grace on the vessels of mercy, which he had afore prepared
unto glory," by sustaining them in the furnace of trial.
2. And immediately I was in the Spirit; and, behold, a throne was set in heaven, and one sat on the throne.
3. And he that sat was to look upon like a jasper and a sardine stone
and there was a rainbow round about the throne, in sight like unto an emerald.
Ever since the revelation of mercy to fallen man, God
deals with mankind, not in essential or absolute character, but by covenant
in economical standing. All along since that epoch in the history of this
world, "the Father judgeth no man, but hath committed all judgment unto
the Son." As yet, however, the Son is not brought upon the stage in the
apostle’s present view the Son has his appropriate place in the vision,
where he will appear as Mediator. In the conflict to be carried on for
twelve hundred and sixty years by the combined powers of earth and hell
"against the Lord and his Anointed," we have the agencies exhibited in
these two chapters only on heaven’s side. The opposing hosts will
afterwards appear.
5. And out of the throne proceeded lightnings, and thunderings, and
voices and there were seven lamps of fire burning before the throne, which
are the seven spirits of God.
7. And the first beast was like a lion, and the second beast like a calf, and the third beast had a face as a man, and the fourth beast was like a flying eagle.
8. And the four beasts had each of them six wings about him, and they were full of eyes within and they rest not day and night, saying, Holy, holy, holy, Lord God Almighty, which was, and is, and is to come.
9. And when those beasts give glory, and honor, and thanks, to him that sat on the throne, who liveth for ever and ever,
10. The four and twenty elders fall down before him that sat on the throne, and worship him that liveth for ever and ever, and cast their crowns before the throne, saying,
11. Thou art worthy, O Lord, to receive glory, and honour, and power,
for thou hast created all things, and for thy pleasure they are and were
created.
In the mean time, what do these "four animals" represent? Not the adorable Trinity, as some learned men have imagined, nor holy angels, as more learned men have supposed and laboured to prove. These "animals" are worshippers, (v 8,) therefore they are not the Object of worship. They are culpably blind who mistake the creature for the Creator. (Rom 1:25.) Other expositors have attempted, with greater plausibility but no better success, to prove these animals to be symbolical of angels. For this purpose, reference has been made to Isaiah’s vision of the seraphims, (ch 6:2,) and also to the "four living creatures" which appeared in vision to Ezekiel, (1:5-10.) The identity of John’s "animals" and Ezekiel’s "living creatures" is argued especially from their number, "four," and their "faces" being the same. To the thoughtful and unbiased reader it is sufficient to reply,—that John’s "animals" acknowledge themselves to have been redeemed by the blood of the Lamb, (ch 5:8,9,) an expression which is inapplicable to angels. As the "four and twenty elders" and the "four animals" comprise the whole company of the redeemed, as distinguished from the higher and lower orders of God’s worshippers, (ch 5:8-14,) and as the "elders" represent the whole church, it would seem to be reasonable to suppose, that these "animals" are the symbols of the gospel ministry. And to this agree their functions as exercised in the farther developments of this book, as we shall see.
One plausible objection to this interpretation is grounded on the fact that their "faces" are the same as those of Ezekiel’s angels,—"of an ox, or young calf, of a lion, of a man, and of an eagle." But each of the "cherubims" had "four faces" whereas these "animals" have but one face each. Nor ought it to be thought incongruous that faithful ministers are represented as possessing some of the properties of holy angels, when we find them called by the same name (ch 1:20,) and also, when we find the Master directing them to imitate and emulate holy angels in their services. (Matt. 6:10, Ps 103:20,21.) These "animals," emblematical of the gospel ministry, are in number "four," answerable to the universality of their mission into the four quarters of the earth,—"all the world." (Matt. 28:19, Mark, 16:15.) So the "four winds," (ch 7:1,) mean all winds. As the "lion, which is the strongest among beasts, and turneth not away for any," is distinguished for courage and magnanimity, so, as a symbol, it represents a ministry of courageous and heroic spirit. Luther in continental, and Knox in insular Europe, may be named as displaying this prominent feature of ministerial character. The "calf" or young ox, symbolizes "patient continuance in well-doing" amidst trials, such as "cruel mockings," etc. The "face as a man" indicates sagacity, "Christian prudence," together with active sympathy. The "flying eagle" is emblematical of penetration and discrimination,—"ability to teach others," from a spiritual insight into the divine character and purposes,—an experimental acquaintance with "the God of glory." All these properties are not to be supposed ordinarily in any one minister, but as distributed among the ministry at large,—"according to the measure of the gift of Christ,"—the Holy Spirit "dividing to every man severally as he will." (Eph. 4:7, 1 Cor 12:11.) It may be remarked, that in some cases all these properties may be discerned in great measure in the same individual. In the gifts and grace of the apostle Paul, may be discovered the boldness of the lion, the patience of the ox, the compassion of the man, and the soaring flight of the eagle. Our covenant God endows his servants for the service to which he calls them, always making good the promise,—"As thy days, so shall thy strength be."
The "six wings," of course, are expressive of the activity of the ministry,—"In season, out of season," emulating the heavenly seraphims in serving the same Lord. They were "full of eyes before, behind, within." They are to "take heed to themselves, and to the ministry which they have received in the Lord, that they fulfil it." (Col 4:17, 1 Tim 4:16.) They are to regard the operation of God’s hand in providence, so as to "have understanding of the times, and know what Israel ought to do." (1 Chron 12:32.) They are to "try the spirits whether they are of God," and "after the first and second admonition, to reject heretics." (Tit 3:10.) They are to "oversee the flock," (Acts 20:28,) and to "watch for souls, as they that must give account" to the Master. (Heb 13:17.) And we may say with Paul,—"Who is sufficient for these things? Modern prelates, who arrogate to themselves the exclusive use of the Scriptural official name "BISHOP," generally manifest that they are only bishops, (two-eyed) and not the many-eyed servants of Christ, symbolized by the "four animals" of our text, or the "overseeing elders" charged at Miletus by the apostle Paul. (Acts 20:17.) "While these men slept, the enemy sowed tares."—In direct acts of worship, these "animals,"—the ministers, take the lead, answerable to another official name,—"guides, in things pertaining to God." (Heb 13:7, [Greek] 5:1.) They are, as well expressed by another phrase, the "sworn expounders of God’s word," and authoritative rulers in his house. Destitute of legislative power, which in ecclesiastical affairs pertains to Christ alone, they are the authorized administrators of all the laws by which his household is to be governed. (Heb 13:7,17.)—The language of adoration here is the same uttered by the seraphim (Isa 6:3.) The "holiness" of God is that aspect of his adorable character which is most attractive to holy angels and redeemed sinners, being the principal feature of the divine image reflected by themselves. (Matt 25:31, Jude 14, 1 John 3:2.) The glorious Being seen by John, as sitting on a throne, is the same who was seen by Isaiah, (6:1,) and precisely in the same attitude, but called by different names. By Isaiah he is denominated "the Lord of Hosts,"—by John, "the Lord God Almighty." The context proves,—especially ch 5:1, that John in vision contemplated God in the person of the Father, whereas we are assured, in John 12:41, that Isaiah saw him in the person of the Son. Thus we may understand our Lord’s words addressed to Philip, (John 14:9,) "He that hath seen me hath seen the Father." (See Heb 1:3, Col 1:15.)
Led by the "four animals,"—the ministry of reconciliation, the "four and twenty elders," representing all the redeemed of mankind, "fall down before him that sat on the throne" in prostrate adoration of that glorious Being whose "eternal power and Godhead" are demonstrated in the volume of creation. We are thus taught that motives to acceptable worship of God are primarily to be found in the perfections of his nature as our beneficent Creator,—perfections possessed by him in essential character, independently of all his works of creation and redemption. His "worthiness" of worship is inherent in himself, but outwardly manifested to intelligent creatures by the work of creation, of which he is the first Cause and the last End,—the efficient and final Cause. This doctrine, understood by the intellect and embraced in the heart, would greatly tend to "hide pride from man." (Job 33:17.) Aside from the doctrine of the "cross," which is still counted "foolishness" by our modern self styled "philosophers, psychologists and freethinkers," there is enough here revealed of this eternal One to humble the "proud looks and haughty hearts" of these "enemies of the King." Without repentance, "he that made them will not have mercy on them, and he that formed them will show them no favour," for notwithstanding their pride of superior intellect, he whose judgment is according to truth, has pronounced them a "people of no understanding." (Isa 27:11.) It is no disparagement to those in places of highest earthly dignity, as David, nor to the wisest of all men, as Solomon to "cast their crowns before the throne" of this only universal Monarch, saying, "Thou art worthy, O Lord, to receive glory and honor and power, for thou hast created all things, and for thy pleasure they are and were created," "and let the whole earth be filled with his glory." (Ps 72:19.)